🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an celebration that began as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate events where Black people are paid to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The wave has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the Britain, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The month has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the celebration is celebrated is a reflection of the political moment. How it evolves is a good lesson in how co-option leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a member of parliament gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a source of worry. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the EU as a whole.

In the America, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A drive to erase African American heritage and experience from the records is in progress. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how little it can be influential if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the situation of the contemporary world. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. Denise Miller, a educator at a learning establishment, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month altogether, believing they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) included in school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What value has simple recognition of the history when it ignores the current situation of far-right rallies in the street? Institutions who observe it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but confronted with the risks that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and responsive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.